Open side-bar Menu
 MCADCafe Editorial
Jeff Rowe
Jeff Rowe
Jeffrey Rowe has over 40 years of experience in all aspects of industrial design, mechanical engineering, and manufacturing. On the publishing side, he has written over 1,000 articles for CAD, CAM, CAE, and other technical publications, as well as consulting in many capacities in the design … More »

PLM Industry Acquisitions and Consolidation – A Good or Bad Thing?

 
December 13th, 2011 by Jeff Rowe

One of the biggest trends we have witnessed in the MCAD market for 2011 has been the number and magnitude of PLM industry acquisition transactions and the possible short- and long-term consequences. It seemed as though in some weeks we received at least one announcement from a major MCAD/PLM player acquiring either another company i its entirety or at least a piece of its PLM-related technology. Although nothing really new, the acquisition train really seemed to pick up steam this year compared to the recent past.

While a lot of technologies were grown organically from the inside of the major MCAD vendors, Autodesk, Dassault Systemes, and PTC also all made significant external acquisitions this year that will diversify and strengthen their offerings. Notably absent in the flurry of acquisitions was Siemens PLM software, although the parent company did do some acquiring in other divisions of the company.

The acquisition mix included everything from CAE, to ECAD, to software lifecycle development management, and a a number of technologies that are a little more esoteric.

Will any one of these acquisitions cause huge changes in the PLM market generally? For the most part, no, but they do point to the fact that the MCAD/PLM market continues to evolve and consolidate. However, the current acquisition/consolidation cycle might have significant impact on users who either already use one of the Autodesk, Dassault, or PTC PLM sets or are are in the process of selecting a PLM set for the first time.

We see no sign of the acquisition train slowing down anytime soon. We actually see the momentum picking up as the major vendors, relatively flush with cash, acquire smaller companies that have technologies that complement their existing product sets.

Though the PLM market continues to consolidate through acquisition, it will never completely consolidate for two reasons:

  1. New independent PLM companies will continue to start up and evolve while developing new technologies.
  2. A lot of independent PLM software development companies (and their customers) are satisfied being independent and want to keep it that way.

There is plenty of room in the PLM space for both camps to co-exist – industry consolidation thorough acquisition and remaining independent. The big boys can continue to expand their PLM sets and the independent software vendors can continue to do and focus on what they do best. Overall, the co-existence diversifies, stabilizes, and moves the PLM market forward while benefiting both vendors and customers.

Kernels Do Still Matter

 
December 8th, 2011 by Jeff Rowe

For the past several years there’s been a lot of chatter throughout the MCAD industry about the significance, or rather, insignificance of one of the main software components – geometric modeling kernels. In other words, do they really matter anymore? I contend that they definitely do still matter.
While it is true that few users really care about the origin of the modeling kernel in their CAD tool, software component kernels are good for the following reasons:

  • They are developed, supported, and maintained by an expert source that focuses on improving specific aspects of the kernels/components.
  • They allow relatively small software organizations to develop applications relatively economically and lets them focus on what they do best on the application side.
  • They are updated and released on a regular schedule so software developer customers can time their application releases accordingly and regularly, knowing that improvements have been made to the kernel.

Of course, a counter argument could be made regarding software components, but most of software component software development and end user customers I have spoken with over the years have generally been pleased with the arrangement and results.

At the beginning of December, we saw a news item stating that some technical institutions in Russia were collaborating and investing ~$22 million over three years to build a “national” 3D solid modeling kernel. According to the news release, “Parasolid is indicated ‘as a functional prototype’ for the project.” What this means for the CAD industry as a whole remains to be seen, and I’m not convinced that a “national” 3D solid modeling kernel is necessarily a good thing, but the effort illustrates that component software is still viable today and into the future.

3D software components are the legacy of several component vendors, with components that include ACIS, CGM, Parasolid, eDrawings, and many others. These components and their developers will continue business for a long time to come. As they were in the past, software components will remain significant and relevant into the future for the MCAD industry.

Will PTC‘s “Lightning“ Strike or Strike Out

 
October 27th, 2010 by Jeff Rowe

We‘re here in Boston to witness has been promising since early summer will “change the face of CAD for the next 20 years“ – – Project Lightning.

Will it be a hit or miss? We‘ll start to discover that tomorrow during a presentation/demonstration of Project Lightning.

We‘ll keep you posted throughout the day as events unfold.

PTC/USER 2010

 
June 14th, 2010 by Jeff Rowe

We just returned from the 2010 PTC/USER conference in Orlando, FL last week and came away with a lot of good information about the future of PTC and its products. This is a real time of transition for the company ranging from its executive management to the way it does business to its product/service offerings.

Unlike the past, the company is talking and acting in a confident manner, not arrogant.

In the next issue of MCADCafe.com Weekly that will be published June 21, We’ll discuss what we saw and heard during the PTC/USER conference.

Altair Engineering’s HyperWorks Technology Conference — Days 2 & 3

 
May 17th, 2010 by Jeff Rowe

Altair Engineering’s Hyperworks Technology Conference (HTC) 2010 showcases its unique product and service offerings, as well as its diverse user base that represents the automotive, aerospace, defense, consumer electronics, and, medical device industries.

While Day 1 was devoted to keynotes and general sessions by Altair executives and major customers, Days 2 and 3 were quite a bit different, but just as compelling.

Day 2 opened with two interesting keynotes. The first one was given by Dave Trop of The Boeing Co. who discussed the increasingly important role that simulation has achieved and the productivity and safety enhancements that it provides. This increasing role was especially evident in the design and manufacture of Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner where composite materials are key structural members, requiring vast amounts of simulation and analysis.

The second kenoter on Day 2 was John Baker from the NASA Engineering & Safety Center. He discussed NASA’s use of Altair’s HyperWorks and RADIOSS technologies for the upcoming Constellation progam that will supersede the Space Shuttle program that is winding down.

The remainder of the day was devoted to presentation tracks — Modeling & Visualization, Optimization, High-Performance Computing (HPC), and Simulation.

I tried to attend as many as possible throughout the day, and the two that I found most intriguing were about cloud computing and a greatly accelerated crash simulation program.

At this point, Altair’s cloud computing effort is regarded as a pilot project by the company, but it is moving ahead with it with the hope of scaling it up in the near future. Many questions, however, remain to be answered, but Altair is approaching this year’s buzzword technology — cloud computing — in a logical and business-like way that will make it more than just a buzzword if all goes according to plan.

Altair’s CAD2CRASH24 was a breakthrough project that succeeded in compressing the time required to mesh, assemble and simulate a full-vehicle crash finite-element model – directly from OEM (from Ford Motor Co.) native CAD data from about three weeks to less than 24 hours.

The feat was a successful attempt to dramatically compress the usual time frame for conducting and presenting a full frontal vehicle crash. This results were made possible with Altair’s software tools, advanced hardware (64 cores), and optimized internal Altair processes.

Day 3 of the conference was devoted to process-specific workshops — Crash/Auto, Optimization, University Programs, and Multi-Body Dynamics, and others. The workshops were conducted primarily by Altair employees, partners, and university professors. The workshop sessions were well attended and covered many topics key to the simulation and analysis communities.

Well over 400 attendees enjoyed three days of Altair product, technology, and direction presentations; educational sessions, and networking opportunities. Without exception, every attendee I talked with was pleased with what the company was providing today and impressed with what will be provided going forward.

Look for extended coverage of the HTC 2010, product information, and interviews with Altair Engineering executives in MCADCafe.com Weekly in the very near future.

Altair Engineering’s HyperWorks Technology Conference — Day 1

 
April 29th, 2010 by Jeff Rowe

I attend a number of technical and engineering conferences over the course of a year, primarily CAD or CAM related, with some CAE thrown in. Some of the events are good, some are not so good, and some are just a waste of time.

Right now I’m at a very interesting CAE event for the first time– Altair Engineering’s Hyperworks Technology Conference (HTC) 2010. From what I’ve experienced so far, I classify this event in the “good” category.

The event showcases its unique product and service offerings, as well as its diverse user base that represents the automotive, aerospace, defense, consumer electronics, and, medical device industries.

If you are not familiar with Altair Engineering, know that is one of the most significant players in design simulation and analysis with its Hyperworks technology whose product and service capabilities are available on a “pay as you go” basis. The plan is based on tokens purchased and used

As far as the industries represented goes, today’s presentations were slanted a bit toward the automotive industry with talks from Ford, Porsche, Michigan Solar Car customers, and GM, but that’s OK – we are in the Detroit area, after all.

I also spent some time with a couple folks involved with Altair’s industrial design tool, solidThinking. It’s a unique and very capable conceptual design tool that I will be spending hands-on time with over the next few weeks as the new version, 8.1, is due to ship in the near future.

This blog post provides just a brief overview of the conference, but I’ll be going into more detail on specifics of what I experienced and who I talked to in the next MCAD Weekly that publishes May 10, 2010.

PTC Gets Social

 
June 11th, 2009 by Jeff Rowe

I thought that one of the most significant things to come out of the PTC/USER conference was not strictly product related so much as a shift in corporate philosophy and mindset.

PTC emphasized what is calling Social Product Development that combines web 2.0 social computing with traditional product development. While the company said that it didn’t believe that social networking by itself was not all that good for product development, its collaborative principles were. Thus, the birth of Social Product Development.

Of course, this was not all PTC’s doing. The company has enlisted Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 as the connection between Web 2.0 and social networking technologies, as well as PTC’s Windchill ProductPoint on top of Pro/E, ProductView, and Mathcad for addressing a new way to collaborate in the engineering and design environment.

PTC drove home the importance of this initiative throughout the conference, so it appears, at least for now, that Social Product Development is not just a marketing gimmick, but a major tenet of doing business moving forward.

PTC, of course, is not the only technical software vendor using SharePoint, but this a big step in the right direction for the company as it looks to the future.

PTC/USER Event – Day One – A Beginning

 
June 8th, 2009 by Jeff Rowe

We’re down here in Orlando for a few days covering the 20th Annual PTC/USER event.

This is the venue where PTC announces and rolls out new products, and that’s exactly the reason we’re here.

Over the course of the next several days and weeks, I’ll fill you in on what I’m seeing and hearing.

This has been a trying year for the MCAD industry (to say the least), and PTC has had its share of ups and downs, making this year’s event particularly interesting for PTC.

Welcome to the MCADCafe Blogs!

 
May 29th, 2009 by Jeff Rowe

I personally invite MCADCafe experts to start your blogs here. Using the blogs, you can share your opinions, ask questions, let people know what you are up to, and project yourself to be an industry guru. You have an audience of  more than 480,000 unique visitors/month. The blogs are also included in our daily newsletter to 40,000 subscribers.




© 2024 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
670 Aberdeen Way, Milpitas, CA 95035
+1 (408) 882-6554 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services  MCADCafe - Mechanical Design and Engineering ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy PolicyAdvertise