MCADCafe
   >> MCAD User News and Reviews
Thread views: 8279 View all threadsNext thread*

Jay
(Unregistered)
10/09/08 03:03 PM
Report this article as Inappropriate to us !!!Login to Reply

I fail to understand why the authors feel so compelled to include their clearly biased and subjective rants against the Bush administration at the end of what otherwise appears to be an informative well-researched article. By injecting that into the article one has to wonder whether they harbor other biases that effect their reporting. More importantly, there is no relevance to their “Geopolitical & Economic Factors” to a report on the MCAD industry. No doubt, they would argue these topics must be reported on to offer a well-rounded review of the industry within the context of the economy in which it operates. However, this is not reporting, it is nothing more than a string of adjectives incorporated into one-sided rant that clearly exposes the author’s biases.


Entire thread
SubjectPosted byPosted on
*MCAD Industry View — A March 2006 UpdateBrian  10/09/08 03:03 PM
.*Kurt  10/09/08 03:03 PM
.*Jay  10/09/08 03:03 PM
.*Brian  10/09/08 03:03 PM
Jump to

 




Internet Business Systems © 2016 Internet Business Systems, Inc.
595 Millich Dr., Suite 216, Campbell, CA 95008
+1 (408)-337-6870 — Contact Us, or visit our other sites:
AECCafe - Architectural Design and Engineering EDACafe - Electronic Design Automation GISCafe - Geographical Information Services TechJobsCafe - Technical Jobs and Resumes ShareCG - Share Computer Graphic (CG) Animation, 3D Art and 3D Models
  Privacy Policy Advertise