September 01, 2003
Patent Infringement Case Protects Rights of License Holder
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on MCADcafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
| by Amy Rowell - Contributing Editor
Each MCAD Weekly Review delivers to its readers news concerning the latest developments in the MCAD industry, MCAD product and company news, featured downloads, customer wins, and coming events, along with a selection of other articles that we feel you might find interesting. Brought to you by MCADCafe.com. If we miss a story or subject that you feel deserves to be included, or you just want to suggest a future topic, please contact us! Questions? Feedback? Click here. Thank you!
Patent Infringement Case Protects Rights of License Holder
by Amy A. Rowell
Court rules that 3D Systems infringed EOS GmbH patent rights
Apparently, it truly pays to buy the rights.
On August 20th, 2003 the United States District Court for the Central District of California ruled in favor of rapid prototyping manufacturer, EOS GmbH, in a patent infringement case that has been on the books for nearly three years. In December 2000, EOS GmbH filed a lawsuit against DTM Corporation of Austin, TX alleging that the Sinterstation and Vanguard laser-sintering rapid prototyping systems manufactured and sold by DTM Corporation, infringed patent rights held by EOS GmbH of Munich, Germany.
And in the final hour, the court sided with EOS GmbH.
3D Systems of California licensed certain rapid prototyping technologies to EOS GmbH in August 1997. As a result of this 1997 license agreement, EOS was licensed under the 3D Systems' patents to the extent the patents pertained to the field of laser sintering.
3D Systems later acquired DTM, in August 2001. And DTM, too, took advantage of this patented laser-sintering technology in the development of its Sinterstation and Vanguard laser-sintering rapid prototyping systems. Unfortunately, it didn't have the right to do so, based on the court's recent ruling.
Specifically, the Court ruled that one claim of one of the 13 asserted 3D Systems' patents, US Patent No. 5,630,981 ('981 patent), licensed to EOS was infringed by every Sinterstation and Vanguard system sold by DTM since August 1997, when EOS acquired the exclusive rights to all 3D Systems. patented laser-sintering technology.
In a counter-claim, 3D Systems asserted that certain nylon powders, which are currently sold by EOS in the U.S., infringe DTM's US Patent No. 5,990,268 (the '268 patent). However, the Court found that this patent contains multiple conflicting definitions of a key term of its claims and cannot be construed, therefore EOS cannot infringe this patent.
Are these rulings fair?
3D Systems doesn't believe they are, and plans to appeal.
"3D Systems is disappointed with the rulings but views this as one step in a long process," said G. Walter Loewenbaum II, Chairman of the Board of Directors. "3D Systems will appeal the rulings and believes that the law and the facts favor its position and will ultimately prevail, particularly given that these issues will be reviewed anew in the appellate court."
EOS GmbH, on the other hand, is hopeful that this will mark the end of the three-year battle.
"We are very pleased with these rulings," stated Dr. Hans J. Langer, founder and Chief Executive Officer of EOS. "The infringement ruling should be no surprise to 3D Systems, as it simply confirms what they told us in writing in 1997 when we were negotiating the license agreement. We find it very regrettable that having sold their laser-sintering rights exclusively to EOS, 3D Systems then decided not only to enter the laser-sintering market in breach of their agreements, but also to pursue legal action against EOS. With these new rulings it is very clear who is infringing who's patent rights. We hope that the whole litigation can now be ended quickly, and we are confident in our position."
Amy Rowell is the managing editor of
, and the editor of MCAD Weekly Review.
Product and Company News
(Note: $$ - denotes premium content. Article is available via a trial subscription or for a nominal fee.)
By applying high-powered engineering, tiny Vectrix Corp. may have created a battery-powered scooter that can go head-to-head with gasoline-powered competitors on both range and acceleration.
, August 18, 2003
The Emerging Technologies Conference 2003 September 24-25, 2003
. Kresge Auditorium, MIT Campus, Cambridge, MA. The Emerging Technologies Conference at MIT
will focus on the technologies that are poised to make a dramatic impact on our world.
Technology Review Magazine
, the authority on emerging technology, will bring together world-renowned innovators and key leaders in technology and business. The 2-day conference will feature a mixture of keynote, panel and breakout discussions that will center on the transformative technological innovations that have the potential to fuel new economic growth.
PLM 2003 -- The Premier Lifecycle Management Event
-- September 15-17, 2003
, Scottsdale, AZ USA. PLM 2003 will take place September 16-17 in Scottsdale, AZ and is geared to executives in the entire spectrum and functional areas of product lifecycle management, with emphasis on lessons learned in the world's leading manufacturing organizations.
PLM Road Map 2003
-- October 28-29, 2003
, Dearborn, Mich USA. Join colleagues and share case histories on leading-edge implementations in Product Lifecycle Management. Topics covered include collaborative design, knowledge capture and reuse, collaborative CAE, high-integrity market-oriented product definition, physical architecture, manufacturing simulation, sourcing, product sales configuration, marketability, metrics and much more.
You can find the full MCADCafe event calendar here
To read more news, click here
-- Amy Rowell, MCADCafe.com Contributing Editor.