September 29, 2003
Closing the CAD/CAM Gap
Please note that contributed articles, blog entries, and comments posted on MCADcafe.com are the views and opinion of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the management and staff of Internet Business Systems and its subsidiary web-sites.
At first glance, CAD and CAM seem to be more similar than they are different, but with over 25 years experience in
mechanical product design, engineering, and manufacturing, I've found the opposite to be true. CAD and CAM technologies do
share some similarities - you create something - one digital, one physical - however, CAD and CAM are different in more ways
than they are similar. And, although major progress has been made to close the gap between CAD and CAM, a considerable gap
The major differences between CAD and CAM really come down to three basic things - workflow, features, and interoperability.
oriented), and the order or sequence in which different processes are performed can be critical in CAM. Simply, CAD defines
a part, whereas CAM defines a part's manufacturing processes and how the part takes shape. Also, the concept of time is an
important aspect of CAM that really isn't a factor at all in CAD. Time is especially important on the manufacturing side
because a part continually changes with different processes over time.
part in a CAD system and can be additive or subtractive. Feature-based CAD packages display features and operations in
history trees, and parts and assemblies can be directly manipulated and modified using these history trees. History trees
also can provide beneficial overviews to manufacturing because they provide insight into how a design was created, as well
as help understand design intent. Manufacturing features, on the other hand, group geometry that will have manufacturing
processes, such as machining applied to them.
issue today. Because of interoperability problems, design intent is often lost as design data moves from CAD to CAM. Data
incompatibility is another huge problem, costing in the tens of billions of dollars annually. One of the most promising
innovations to remedy CAD/CAM data incompatibility is the Super Model Project being driven by Step Tools Inc. The
the Standard for Product Data Exchange (STEP) is to provide a comprehensive, extensible standard for product data throughout
a product's entire life cycle. The goal of the Super Model Project is to develop software and databases for an integrated
design-to-manufacturing system that allows CNC machine tools to be controlled by product design data. So will STEP-NC signal
the end of G-code for controlling machine tools? A number of CAM software vendors and manufacturing organizations are
betting that it will.
While a few vendors of CAD products have managed to integrate CAM functions into their products, the more common approach is
to have a suite of separate products for handling the CAD and CAM functions of design and manufacturing. There are, however,
still major compromises if either approach is taken. On the one hand, CAD users don't want to be constrained by having to
predict manufacturing processes. On the other hand, CAM users don't want to be forced to produce parts that are either too
expensive to produce, or can't be realistically produced at all. So it's a tough dilemma getting CAD and CAM software
products and their respective users to work together.
Even though they are so different, will CAD and CAM ever join as one? Ultimately, I think they will. For the time being,
however, the differences between CAD and CAM will continue to impede their integration, largely because their workflows and
final results are so different. Because of how they are used, most CAD and CAM software products look, feel, and behave
differently, and probably will for the foreseeable future, but not forever.
CADKEY's President and CEO Discusses IMSI Acquisition
think3 CEO Joe Costello Headlines VirtualMCAD 2003
Study Shows Automakers Provide More Jobs in Supplier and Related Industries Than in Direct Manufacturing
Study Finds North American Automakers, Parts Suppliers To Move Key Business Processes Offshore
Product and Company News
Alias Delivers New ImageStudio Rendering Software and Upgrades StudioTools and PortfolioWall Industrial Design Software
Forming Technologies Unveils FASTFORM Advanced Version 10
SolidWorks and Bluebeam Communicate 2D Design Files with PDF or 3D Models with SolidWorks eDrawings
Spatial Announces R12 Release That Delivers Refinements and Performance Gains
Synergis Ships Adept Document Management For Latest Autodesk Design Products
IMSI Releases DesignCAD Version 14 Line of Products
Solid Edge Version 14 'Certified Select' Status Awarded to ANSYS DesignSpace
MSC.Software Hosts North American Virtual Product Development Conference
Delcam's PowerINSPECT Aids Inspection In A Demanding Environment
D-Cubed Releases Version 45.0 of 2D DCM
ESPRIT 2003 CAM System Now Shipping
Irv Christy Appointed Director of Strategic Alliances for CoCreate Software
Tecnomatix Completes Acquisition of USDATA Corp.
IMSI Acquires CADalog.com
Cyco Software Appoints New Business Development Manager
--Jeffrey Rowe is Editor and Publisher of MCADCafé and MCADWeekly Review. He can be reached at
You can find the full MCADCafe event calendar here.
To read more news, click here.
-- Jeff Rowe, MCADCafe.com Contributing Editor.
Be the first to review this article